Get $25 Off On Subscription Orders!

{"id":555859345481,"title":"MUD\\WTR Review: Is it Better Than Coffee?","created_at":"2021-09-20T20:14:25-04:00","body_html":"\u003cscript type=\"application\/ld+json\"\u003e\/\/ \u003c![CDATA[\n{\n \"@context\": \"https:\/\/schema.org\",\n \"@type\": \"Article\",\n \"headline\": \"MUD WTR Review: Is it Better Than Coffee?\",\n \"keywords\": \"mud wtr, mud wtr review, mud wtr ingredients\",\n \"description\": \"Our MD reviews the ingredients in MUD WTR based on medical research to determine if it’s likely to be an effective coffee alternative. We also review some of the health claims the company makes and explain why they're misleading.\",\n \"url\": \"https:\/\/illuminatelabs.org\/blogs\/health\/mud-wtr-review\",\n\"author\": {\n \"@type\": \"Person\",\n \"name\": \"Taylor Graber MD\",\n \"url\": \"https:\/\/illuminatelabs.org\/pages\/taylor-graber\",\n \"sameAs\": \"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/taylor-j-graber-md-81351642\/\",\n \"jobTitle\": \"Content Partner\",\n \"knowsAbout\": \"medicine, health, anesthesiology, iv therapy, science, drugs, pharmaceutical, medical research, scientific research, medical journals, entrepreneurship, healthcare, orthopedic surgery, biomedical engineering\",\n \"alumniOf\": {\n \"@type\": \"EducationalOrganization\",\n \"name\": [\n \"University of California San Diego\",\n \"Arizona University\",\n \"University of Arizona College of Medicine\"\n ]\n },\n \"memberOf\": {\n \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n \"name\": \"Illuminate Labs\"\n }\n},\n\"contributor\": {\n \"@type\": \"Person\",\n \"name\": \"Calloway Cook\",\n \"url\": \"https:\/\/illuminatelabs.org\/pages\/calloway-cook\",\n \"sameAs\": \"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/calloway-cook\/\",\n \"jobTitle\": \"President\",\n \"knowsAbout\": \"entrepreneurship, dietary supplements, herbal supplements, eCommerce, medical research\",\n \"alumniOf\": {\n \"@type\": \"EducationalOrganization\",\n \"name\": \"S.I. Newhouse School of Public Communications at Syracuse University\"\n },\n \"memberOf\": {\n \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n \"name\": \"Illuminate Labs\"\n }\n},\n\"editor\": {\n \"@type\": \"Person\",\n \"name\": \"DJ Mazzoni\",\n \"honorificSuffix\": [\n \"M.S.\",\n \"R.D.\",\n \"C.D.N.\",\n \"C.S.C.S.\"\n ],\n \"url\": \"https:\/\/illuminatelabs.org\/pages\/dj-mazzoni\",\n \"sameAs\": \"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/dj-mazzoni-rd-cdn-cscs-00a33038\/\",\n \"jobTitle\": \"Medical Reviewer\",\n \"knowsAbout\": \"exercise, drugs, pharmaceutical, health, workout, strength and conditioning, nutrition, dietetics, medicine, medical research, scientific research, scientific method, healthcare, patient care, wellness\",\n \"alumniOf\": {\n \"@type\": \"EducationalOrganization\",\n \"name\": [\n \"State University of New York College Oswego\",\n \"D’Youville College\"\n ]\n },\n \"memberOf\": {\n \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n \"name\": \"Illuminate Labs\"\n }\n},\n\"image\": {\n\"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n\"url\": \"https:\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0047\/1524\/9737\/files\/MUD_WTR_Thumbnail.jpg?v=1642556851\",\n\"width\": \"3000\",\n\"height\": \"3000\"\n},\n\"citation\": [\n\"https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/31209936\/\", \n\"https:\/\/examine.com\/supplements\/ganoderma-lucidum\/\",\n\"https:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pmc\/articles\/PMC5987239\/\",\n\"https:\/\/examine.com\/supplements\/cordyceps\/\",\n\"https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/27612937\/\",\n\"https:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/books\/NBK223795\/\",\n\"https:\/\/illuminatelabs.org\/blogs\/health\/balance-of-nature-review\"\n],\n\"mentions\": [{\n \"@type\": \"Thing\",\n \"name\": \"tea\"\n },\n {\n \"@type\": \"Thing\",\n \"name\": \"nootropic\"\n },\n {\n \"@type\": \"Thing\",\n \"name\": \"mushrooms\"\n },\n {\n \"@type\": \"Thing\",\n \"name\": \"caffeine\"\n },\n {\n \"@type\": \"Thing\",\n \"name\": \"third-party tested\"\n }\n],\n\"datePublished\": \"2021-11-26\",\n\"copyrightHolder\": {\n \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n \"name\": \"Illuminate Labs\"\n},\n\"publisher\": {\n \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n \"name\": \"Illuminate Labs\",\n \"url\": \"https:\/\/illuminatelabs.org\/\",\n \"description\": \"Illuminate Labs is the most transparent supplement company in the U.S., and is a leading publisher of research-based health information.\",\n \"knowsAbout\": \"supplements, science, nutrition, exercise, health, medication, pharmaceutical, wellness, diet, weight loss, medical research\",\n \"publishingPrinciples\": \"https:\/\/illuminatelabs.org\/pages\/editorial-guidelines\",\n \"logo\": {\n \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n \"url\": \"https:\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0047\/1524\/9737\/files\/Illuminate_Labs_Logo.png?v=1641249064\", \n \"width\": 150,\n \"height\": 150\n},\n \"foundingDate\": \"2019-01-30\",\n \"Address\": {\n \"@type\": \"PostalAddress\",\n \"streetAddress\": \"50 Union Street, Unit 9\",\n \"addressLocality\": \"Northampton\",\n \"addressRegion\": \"Massachusetts\",\n \"postalCode\": \"01060\",\n \"addressCountry\": \"US\"\n},\n \"sameAs\": [\n \"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/illuminatelabs\",\n \"https:\/\/twitter.com\/illuminatelabs\",\n \"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/illuminate-labs-supplements\",\n \"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCpgSJAsIPb-fZ25djtTxBEA\"\n ]\n }\n}\n\/\/ ]]\u003e\u003c\/script\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003e\u003cimg src=\"https:\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0047\/1524\/9737\/files\/MUD_WTR_Review_Article_Header_Image_Optimized.png?v=1632183635\" alt=\"\"\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"dc\"\u003eM\u003c\/span\u003eUD\\WTR is a powdered tea that markets itself as a coffee alternative. In this article we’ll review its ingredients based on medical research to determine if it’s healthy and if it can provide the same nootropic (cognitive-enhancing) effects as coffee.\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2 style=\"text-align: center;\"\u003e\u003cb\u003eFormulation Review\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003e\u003cimg src=\"https:\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0047\/1524\/9737\/files\/MUD_WTR_Ingredients.png?v=1632183649\" alt=\"MUD WTR ingredients list\" style=\"display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;\"\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003eThe main active ingredient in MUD\\WTR is a mushroom blend. The mushrooms included are: chaga, reishi, lion’s mane, and cordyceps.\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003eThese are all safe and well-studied mushrooms, but this formulation seems underdosed for any nootropic or medical benefit. Each mushroom has a dosage of 562 milligrams (mg).This is a relatively low amount, especially since these are just raw mushroom powders and not more concentrated extract powders.\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003eA \u003c\/span\u003e\u003ca href=\"https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/31209936\/\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003emedical review\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/a\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003e of studies on chaga for health benefit all used vastly higher doses (some upwards of 10x higher) than the dosage in MUD\\WTR, and most used chaga extract not raw chaga.\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003eExamine.com reviewed \u003c\/span\u003e\u003ca href=\"https:\/\/examine.com\/supplements\/ganoderma-lucidum\/\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003eall available studies\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/a\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003e on reishi, and we can’t find one single study suggesting it’s effective in a raw powder form at a dose as low as 562 mg.\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003eA \u003c\/span\u003e\u003ca href=\"https:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pmc\/articles\/PMC5987239\/\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003emeta-review of lion’s mane\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/a\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003e found it to be effective for a wide range of nootropic functions, but again every study (except for one retracted) used a dose far higher than that in MUD\\WTR.\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003eCordyceps \u003c\/span\u003e\u003ca href=\"https:\/\/examine.com\/supplements\/cordyceps\/\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003ehas been studied\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/a\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003e for athletic performance enhancement (without much convincing evidence), but the dose used tends to be at least 1,000 mg\/day or around 2x what’s in MUD\\WTR.\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003eSince we can’t find a single study showing such a low dose of these mushrooms to be effective for anything, and since MUD\\WTR doesn’t publish any scientific research of their own, we can conclude that the mushroom blend in MUD\\WTR is unlikely to be effective for any nootropic or medical benefit. \u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003eThis tea also includes a blend of spices such as ginger and cardamom, and a black tea powder for caffeine. MUD\\WTR doesn’t publish the caffeine content, but says it’s 1\/7 the caffeine of a coffee, so we can assume there’s around 15 mg caffeine in this formulation which is quite low.\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003eThe minimum threshold for caffeine to be effective as a nootropic appears to be around 40 mg \u003ca href=\"https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/27612937\/\"\u003ebased on medical research\u003c\/a\u003e, so we can conclude that the amount in MUD\\WTR has no likely benefit.\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2 style=\"text-align: center;\"\u003e\u003cb\u003eQuestionable Health Claims\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003eMUD\\WTR claims their lion’s mane inclusion “supports energy and focus” and reishi supports “immunity”, amongst other claims.\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003eWe strongly disagree with these health claims and find them to be fraudulent marketing. To argue that your product supports a health function you must be using an effective dose. Caffeine supports focus, but if an energy drink included 1 nanogram of caffeine and claimed their product supported focus it would be deceptive and fraudulent marketing because the benefits are totally dependent on an effective dose.\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003eThere is no clinical evidence we can find that any dose in this product is effective for anything, and the company doesn’t provide any. Thus, we can conclude that it’s just a regular tea and isn’t likely to support any specific element of health or wellness.\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003eWe also find it strange that the product is marketed as a “coffee replacement” when it contains a dose of caffeine that’s below the effective dose of at least 32 mg (and usually much higher) \u003c\/span\u003e\u003ca href=\"https:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/books\/NBK223795\/\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003ebased on research\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/a\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003e. \u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003eCaffeine is the key ingredient in coffee that gives it its nootropic (cognitive-enhancing) effects. You can replace coffee with anything, but this product is no more of a coffee replacement than water, given that neither can substitute the benefits that coffee provides.\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003eWe don’t think there’s anything harmful about this formulation, and it’s good that they use no filler ingredients or added sugars, but it’s just an overpriced regular tea blend and not some special nootropic product.\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003eMUD\\WTR also claims that their products are all third-party tested for botanical identity, which is important because there’s tons of product quality issues in the supplement industry. But why not publish the tests if you have them? \u003c\/span\u003e\u003ca href=\"https:\/\/illuminatelabs.org\/blogs\/health\/balance-of-nature-review\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003eBalance of Nature\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/a\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003e is another company we recently reviewed which makes the same claims with no proof. \u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003eIf you have the tests, publish them. Otherwise consumers have no reason to believe you. Reputable supplement and nutraceutical companies should be publishing independent testing proving the purity and label accuracy of their products at the bare minimum.\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2 style=\"text-align: center;\"\u003e\u003cb\u003eConclusion\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003eMUD\\WTR is not a coffee alternative by any objective determination. Nor is there any proof it will boost your immunity or energy.\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003eIt’s an herbal tea blend. We take no issue with the formulation itself, but we do take issue with the unproven health claims.\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003eWe’d recommend that the company publishes third-party testing that they claim to have, and publishes an article explaining what research backs their health claims. Because maybe we missed it, but we researched pretty thoroughly and we don’t see any.\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003eWe don’t recommend this product at all; you can buy bulk mushroom powder for much cheaper, and you should probably be considering mushroom extracts if you’re seeking health benefits because most of the medical research on mushrooms uses extracts rather than raw powder.\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e","blog_id":49281925193,"author":"Calloway Cook","user_id":26601750601,"published_at":"2021-11-26T12:00:01-05:00","updated_at":"2022-01-18T20:51:41-05:00","summary_html":"We review the ingredients in coffee alternative MUD\\WTR based on medical research to determine if it’s likely to be effective. We also review some of the health claims the company makes and explain why they're misleading.","template_suffix":"","handle":"mud-wtr-review","tags":"_related:coffee, _related:tea"}

MUD\WTR Review: Is it Better Than Coffee?

MUD\WTR Review: Is it Better Than Coffee?


| |
Read our Editorial Guidelines to learn more about what makes our site the premier resource for online health information.
| |
Read our Editorial Guidelines to learn more about what makes our site the premier resource for online health information.


Read our Editorial Guidelines to learn more about what makes our site the premier resource for online health information.

MUD\WTR is a powdered tea that markets itself as a coffee alternative. In this article we’ll review its ingredients based on medical research to determine if it’s healthy and if it can provide the same nootropic (cognitive-enhancing) effects as coffee.

Formulation Review

MUD WTR ingredients list

The main active ingredient in MUD\WTR is a mushroom blend. The mushrooms included are: chaga, reishi, lion’s mane, and cordyceps.

These are all safe and well-studied mushrooms, but this formulation seems underdosed for any nootropic or medical benefit. Each mushroom has a dosage of 562 milligrams (mg).This is a relatively low amount, especially since these are just raw mushroom powders and not more concentrated extract powders.

A medical review of studies on chaga for health benefit all used vastly higher doses (some upwards of 10x higher) than the dosage in MUD\WTR, and most used chaga extract not raw chaga.

Examine.com reviewed all available studies on reishi, and we can’t find one single study suggesting it’s effective in a raw powder form at a dose as low as 562 mg.

A meta-review of lion’s mane found it to be effective for a wide range of nootropic functions, but again every study (except for one retracted) used a dose far higher than that in MUD\WTR.

Cordyceps has been studied for athletic performance enhancement (without much convincing evidence), but the dose used tends to be at least 1,000 mg/day or around 2x what’s in MUD\WTR.

Since we can’t find a single study showing such a low dose of these mushrooms to be effective for anything, and since MUD\WTR doesn’t publish any scientific research of their own, we can conclude that the mushroom blend in MUD\WTR is unlikely to be effective for any nootropic or medical benefit. 

This tea also includes a blend of spices such as ginger and cardamom, and a black tea powder for caffeine. MUD\WTR doesn’t publish the caffeine content, but says it’s 1/7 the caffeine of a coffee, so we can assume there’s around 15 mg caffeine in this formulation which is quite low.

The minimum threshold for caffeine to be effective as a nootropic appears to be around 40 mg based on medical research, so we can conclude that the amount in MUD\WTR has no likely benefit.

Questionable Health Claims

MUD\WTR claims their lion’s mane inclusion “supports energy and focus” and reishi supports “immunity”, amongst other claims.

We strongly disagree with these health claims and find them to be fraudulent marketing. To argue that your product supports a health function you must be using an effective dose. Caffeine supports focus, but if an energy drink included 1 nanogram of caffeine and claimed their product supported focus it would be deceptive and fraudulent marketing because the benefits are totally dependent on an effective dose.

There is no clinical evidence we can find that any dose in this product is effective for anything, and the company doesn’t provide any. Thus, we can conclude that it’s just a regular tea and isn’t likely to support any specific element of health or wellness.

We also find it strange that the product is marketed as a “coffee replacement” when it contains a dose of caffeine that’s below the effective dose of at least 32 mg (and usually much higher) based on research

Caffeine is the key ingredient in coffee that gives it its nootropic (cognitive-enhancing) effects. You can replace coffee with anything, but this product is no more of a coffee replacement than water, given that neither can substitute the benefits that coffee provides.

We don’t think there’s anything harmful about this formulation, and it’s good that they use no filler ingredients or added sugars, but it’s just an overpriced regular tea blend and not some special nootropic product.

MUD\WTR also claims that their products are all third-party tested for botanical identity, which is important because there’s tons of product quality issues in the supplement industry. But why not publish the tests if you have them? Balance of Nature is another company we recently reviewed which makes the same claims with no proof. 

If you have the tests, publish them. Otherwise consumers have no reason to believe you. Reputable supplement and nutraceutical companies should be publishing independent testing proving the purity and label accuracy of their products at the bare minimum.

Get our most popular articles straight to your inbox
Stay up-to-date on our research reviews

Conclusion

MUD\WTR is not a coffee alternative by any objective determination. Nor is there any proof it will boost your immunity or energy.

It’s an herbal tea blend. We take no issue with the formulation itself, but we do take issue with the unproven health claims.

We’d recommend that the company publishes third-party testing that they claim to have, and publishes an article explaining what research backs their health claims. Because maybe we missed it, but we researched pretty thoroughly and we don’t see any.

We don’t recommend this product at all; you can buy bulk mushroom powder for much cheaper, and you should probably be considering mushroom extracts if you’re seeking health benefits because most of the medical research on mushrooms uses extracts rather than raw powder.





Liquid error: Could not find asset snippets/search-bar.liquid